International contracts
In an increasingly globalized and interconnected business world, expanding one’s activity beyond national borders is a crucial strategy for corporate growth. However, this opportunity involves a series of legal and commercial complexities that cannot be managed solely through business practices developed in the Italian domestic market.
Managing relationships with foreign partners requires careful preparation and prior analysis of different economic, commercial, and regulatory conditions. A frequent mistake, which must be avoided, is assuming that the practices of the Italian system can be immediately transferred to a foreign counterpart. International contracts differ from domestic ones due to their atypical and complex nature, which makes it necessary to adopt detailed, comprehensive, and self-regulating provisions. In this context, the contractual instrument is not a mere formal requirement, but a fundamental operational tool for implementing the company’s marketing strategy and commercial objectives.
To face these challenges with maximum security, and to prevent costly economic disputes arising from incomplete or inadequate agreements, the assistance of experienced lawyers is essential, capable of creating a solid and tailored legal framework for each specific business operation. We aim to offer you a professional overview of the requirements and challenges of international contracting, highlighting the importance of preventive and specialized legal advice.

Types of international contracts
International contracts, designed to regulate commercial relationships that transcend national borders, include various types. The most fundamental and widespread among them is the international sale of goods contract. This type of contract governs the transfer of goods between parties with places of business in different States and raises particular issues concerning, for example, the risk of loss of goods during transport.
In this regard, the Vienna Convention of 11 April 1980 on the International Sale of Goods (CISG) aims to establish a uniform discipline for the formation of contracts and for the rights and obligations of the parties. It is important to note that the Convention applies only to sales between parties having their places of business in contracting States, and it exclusively governs commercial sales, thus excluding consumer sales and sales concerning specific categories of goods, such as ships, vessels, electricity, or judicial sales. One of the aspects addressed by the CISG is also the conformity of goods.
Another essential contractual figure for international expansion is the commercial agency contract. This contract is specifically intended to promote or, in some cases, to conclude business on behalf of the principal, operating in a defined area and on a stable basis. The agent, defined as a “commercial agent”, undertakes to promote the principal’s business, while remaining a third party in relation to the final contractual relationship between the principal and the customer. The rules governing this relationship, in particular those concerning the rights and obligations of the agent, commission, exclusivity, and termination indemnity, may vary significantly across jurisdictions. Within the European Union, Directive 86/653/EEC introduced harmonization rules on agency matters.
In addition to these, international practice makes wide use of the distribution agreement, which involves a sale in the strict sense. In this structure, the distributor purchases products from the supplier (the manufacturer) to resell them in its own name and at its own risk. The distributor differs from the agent because it does not merely promote business, but operates directly within the distribution chain, supporting the commercial and financial organization for product sales, including inventory management and after-sales assistance.
Another important type is the franchising agreement, which arises when a company grants a franchisee, a legally independent entity, the right to exploit its know-how and brand for the distribution of products or services. There are several forms of franchising, such as distribution, production, and service franchising.
Other notable types include the license agreement, which may concern patents, trademarks, or know-how, and the international procurement contract. Finally, for complex projects and long-term structured cooperation, the joint venture agreement is adopted, which may take either a contractual or corporate form, as well as the network agreement. All these arrangements reflect the need for a detailed legal framework to manage the operational and legal challenges of cross-border trade.
Key legal aspects
The international nature of a contract typically refers to the creation of a legal and economic relationship between parties belonging to different legal systems, having their places of business in different States. Conceptually, a contract may be defined as international when it presents elements of “foreignness” connecting it to the legal systems of other countries.
The peculiarity of cross-border commerce lies in the absence of an international legal system capable of univocally resolving conflicts of law or automatically filling contractual gaps. For this reason, the principle of contractual autonomy plays an essential role, allowing the parties to freely determine the content of the contract, within the limits imposed by mandatory rules (rules of necessary application).
The first crucial decision concerns the applicable law. Most legal systems allow the parties to freely choose the law governing international contracts, which is considered the “cornerstone” of conflict-of-law rules in contractual matters, as provided by EU Regulation 593/2008 (Rome I). In the absence of an explicit choice of applicable law, private international law (PIL) systems determine the applicable law through specific connecting factors, such as the law of the country most closely connected or the residence of the party performing the characteristic obligation (for example, the seller’s obligation in an international sale contract). Failure to make this preliminary choice postpones the verification of the adequacy of the contractual clauses to the time of a potential dispute, increasing uncertainty, time, and costs.
The main problem arises from the lack of uniformity among national PIL systems: when no choice is made, applying different PIL rules can lead to contradictory results. For instance, one jurisdiction might apply the law of the place where the contract was concluded, while another might refer to the law of the place of performance. Judges in different countries, applying their respective PIL rules to the same case, may end up applying different laws, resulting in an outcome that depends on where the dispute is brought, whether before the court of one country or another. This unpredictability of traditional connecting criteria significantly increases uncertainty.
An alternative approach, considered more practical especially in arbitration, is to resort to the lex mercatoria. This theory consists in subjecting the international contract not to a specific national law, but to general rules and principles, widely recognized in international trade. This a-national or “transnational” solution offers a neutral legal framework, making it decidedly more suitable for resolving disputes in an international context compared to the application of a state law. In this context, arbitrators have greater discretion in determining the applicable law than national courts, and they tend to prefer solutions they deem most appropriate for resolving the dispute.

Negotiation and formation of the international contract
The negotiation phase of international contracts is complex and often fraught with pitfalls, mainly due to the need to harmonize different legal systems and the multiplicity of commercial and cultural habits. The failure of negotiations in this field often stems from insufficient preparation regarding the applicable law and the lack of clear rules governing the pre-contractual stages. To ensure a positive outcome and protect the company’s interests, it is essential to establish from the outset a behavioral framework based on good faith.
Before the final signing, the parties often resort to preparatory documents such as Letters of Intent (LOI) or Memoranda of Understanding (MOU). These documents may serve different purposes: outlining the objectives that guide the negotiation, defining the methods and timing of discussions, and even setting out elements of the future international commercial contract. It is crucial that the parties explicitly state whether the commitments undertaken in these documents are binding or not, because in the absence of such clarity, the court could interpret the LOI as a contract already concluded or as the basis for pre-contractual liability.
With regard to pre-contractual liability, it arises for the party who withdraws from negotiations without justification, causing damage to the counterpart who had legitimately relied on the conclusion of the contract. Such liability entails the obligation to compensate for the expenses incurred and for the losses resulting from the failed deal (actual damages and loss of profit).
Finally, the formation of the contract is completed when the acceptance of the offer becomes effective. While the Italian legal system adopts the principle of cognition (the contract is concluded when the offeror becomes aware of the acceptance), other systems, such as Common Law, apply the mailbox rule. It is necessary to distinguish between a true offer, which expresses a serious intent to be bound, and a mere invitation to offer, such as catalog displays, which do not bind the offeror. Proper management of offer and acceptance is vital to determine the exact moment when contractual obligations arise.

Essential clauses of international contracts
The drafting of international contracts is guided by the need to create documents that are as complete and self-sufficient as possible, following the Anglo-Saxon self-regulation approach. The main objective of international contracting is to minimize the supplementary intervention of national laws (the applicable law), making the contract both enforceable and understandable for the managers who must implement it. This practice results in the drafting of highly detailed texts, including accessory clauses known as boilerplate clauses, designed to safeguard the contract’s integrity.
A fundamental element is linguistic clarity and correct interpretation. Contracts are often drafted in English and later translated; in such cases, it is crucial to establish which language version shall prevail in the event of interpretative discrepancies. Generally, it is agreed that the original text is the only binding version, often opting for English as the reference language.
A recurring issue arises when the parties use their own General Terms and Conditions, giving rise to what is known as the Battle of the Forms. This conflict occurs when the parties exchange forms containing differing terms. The courts must then determine which set of terms applies to the international commercial contract. The most widely accepted international solution is the so-called knock-out rule: the contract is considered concluded, but only the matching clauses between the two forms remain valid, while conflicting ones cancel each other out, leaving it to the supplementary rules of the applicable law to fill in the gaps.
Regarding the management of non-performance, an essential clause is the pre-determination of damages. It is common to include liquidated damages clauses, through which the parties fix in advance the amount due in the event of a breach, in order to avoid the complex quantification of damages. However, the chosen national law (the applicable law) determines the limits of such clauses, such as the possibility, provided in many Civil Law systems, for the judge to reduce the amount if it is manifestly excessive.
Management and resolution of disputes
One of the most relevant decisions in drafting international contracts concerns the choice of the dispute resolution method and the identification of the competent forum in the case of international contracts. Generally, there is no universally superior method, but the choice must be informed, evaluating arbitration or ordinary jurisdiction.
International commercial arbitration offers significant advantages, such as the neutrality of the tribunal, the specific expertise of the arbitrators, procedural simplicity, and confidentiality. Moreover, an arbitral award is valid and enforceable in most countries, thanks to the wide adoption of the 1958 New York Convention, ratified by more than 160 States, which obliges national courts to recognize and enforce arbitral awards. In contrast, a judgment issued by a state court may encounter recognition and enforcement difficulties, given the limited number of bilateral conventions signed by Italy in this field.
If arbitration is chosen, it is highly recommended to opt for institutional arbitration administered by reputable organizations (such as the International Chamber of Commerce in Paris or the Milan Chamber of Arbitration), as it ensures greater certainty regarding the procedure, timing, and costs, unlike ad hoc arbitration, which allows too much autonomy, increasing the risk of procedural deadlocks.
If, instead, ordinary jurisdiction is chosen, the competent court may be that of one’s own country, the counterpart’s country, or a third country. In the absence of agreement on the applicable law and jurisdiction, identification will fall to private international law rules, such as EU Regulation 1215/2012 (Brussels I-bis) in the European context, which as a general rule identifies jurisdiction at the defendant’s place of business or at the place of performance of the characteristic obligation (for example, the place of delivery of goods in an international sales contract).
Tax and customs aspects in international contracts
The management of central offices responsible for tax and accounting compliance, especially within an organizational structure spread across multiple jurisdictions, requires continuous coordination and control. It is essential that the Italian headquarters remain constantly informed about the operational activities of its foreign branches and that it applies domestic tax provisions in harmony with international regulations. This requires that offices take into account available economic and human resources and be able to provide timely responses, avoiding any form of improvisation.
In the context of international contracts, the proper management of customs and tax aspects, which fall under compliance obligations, is a primary duty. With regard to customs obligations, these arise from the provisions set out in the EU Customs Code and other specific regulations and are established in relation to any activity of import or export of goods. The debtor of the customs obligation is not always the party exercising the customs right, but rather the one who holds the power to dispose of the goods at the relevant moment for customs purposes, even if not economically exploiting them. It is crucial to prevent the customs obligation from becoming passive, because although in such a case it may be extinguished, the debtor remains liable for payment, possibly with penalties.
To prevent disputes and sanctions, companies must adopt internal control systems and documented procedures to ensure the traceability of cross-border operations. This approach includes the adoption of a self-auditing system or corporate customs compliance programs, which serve to prevent operational irregularities and strengthen reliability in the eyes of customs authorities. The primary objective, therefore, is to ensure that operations, including the correct determination and payment of duties, are carried out regularly and are constantly monitored.
Best practices in drafting and managing contracts
The lawyer specialized in international contracting must act as a true law maker, creating the operational framework that enables the implementation of business objectives. Completeness and clarity are the fundamental requirements of a merchants’ contract, which must be a practical tool for the internationalization of the company.
An effective contract must be concise, but not at the expense of the detail of the provisions, and must be understandable not only for lawyers but especially for the managers who will execute it. International best practice, largely derived from Anglo-Saxon drafting techniques, favors extremely detailed and self-sufficient contracts (self-regulatory). This approach is better suited to the uncertainties arising from the need to submit the contract to a foreign applicable law, and it provides the opportunity to build within the contract the detailed “contractual procedure” that the parties must follow.
It is crucial to avoid the typical mistake of many civil law lawyers who, accustomed to the integrative role of the civil code, leave ambiguous or incomplete formulations, relying on the possibility of later interpretation, an approach that is fatal in international contracts. The lawyer, based on international contractual practice, must craft a tailor-made contract, designed specifically for the company and the business operation. Drafting must focus on the “internal” and peculiar elements of the relationship, identifying potential issues and providing specific internal remedies, rather than merely referring to generic codified rules.
Typical scenarios / Case studies
The typical scenarios have been developed by drawing on the most significant corporate immigration cases that the firm regularly handles, with the aim of creating structured, complex examples that help the reader navigate their own situation. The case studies, by contrast, illustrate individual real-life matters, anonymised to protect client confidentiality, presented with full factual and contextual detail.
US professional chooses Italy: elective residence obtained and future planned
American professional obtains an elective residence visa while maintaining ties with the USA. Integrated assistance from legal strategy to property search..
US opera singer obtains work authorization in 7 days
American opera singer with contracts already signed with an Italian theatre. Self employment work authorization obtained on an urgent basis to meet professional commitments.
US client purchases property in Rome: secure transaction
American client assisted in the purchase of a property in Rome. Urban planning issues and contractual risks identified and resolved before signing, transaction completed through notarial power of attorney.
American investor: from New York to a villa in Tuscany
Cross-border property transaction with full relocation service. Purchase of a high-end property, with tax status, residency and NHS registration handled remotely.
Canadian couple, retirement property in Puglia
From Toronto to the Itria Valley. Purchase of a farmhouse with cadastral issues, 7% flat tax on foreign pensions, elective residence visa and healthcare transition.
British entrepreneur, opening a business in Milan
Post-Brexit, a London-based tech entrepreneur establishes an operational headquarters in Milan. Immigration pathway as a non-EU national, company incorporation, and tax planning.
Swiss retiree: 7% flat tax regime in Southern Italy
A banking executive relocates from Zurich to Calabria. Management of the Swiss occupational pension pillar, Italy-Switzerland Tax Convention, and deregistration from the cantonal tax register.
American couple: retirement project in Abruzzo with visa and flat tax
From Connecticut to Abruzzo. Elective residency visa, 7% flat tax coordinated with IRS and FATCA obligations, and transition from Medicare to the Italian NHS (SSN).
German couple, from Munich to Tropea
Retired engineers from the Bavarian automotive sector. Multi-tier pension management, Italy-Germany Tax Convention, and the 7% preferential tax regime.
Startup tech: apertura filiale italiana per il mercato EU
A Bay Area SaaS company establishes a Milan headquarters. Innovative startup SRL, EU Blue Card for the team, transfer pricing, impatriates tax regime, and GDPR compliance.
Fashion brand, representative office in Milan
Brand premium newyorkese apre presidio a Milano. Strutturazione per evitare stabile organizzazione, trasferimento direttrice creativa e gestione showroom.
Manufacturing company, ICT transfers to Italy
Multinazionale giapponese trasferisce 3 figure chiave in Piemonte. Permessi ICT per manager e specialista, coordinamento consolare e regime impatriati per tutti i dipendenti.
How Boschetti International Law Firm can assist with international contracts in Italy

Boschetti International Law Firm positions itself as a strategic partner for Italian companies engaged in internationalization processes, offering high-level expertise and a proactive approach essential for modern international contracting. Our role is not limited to handling litigation, but operates preventively, supporting the company from the initial stage of designing and structuring the international commercial contract, positioning ourselves as law makers.
This enables us to fully understand the client’s business objectives and the peculiarities of the target market, and to translate them into effective legal solutions. Our assistance is crucial for drafting tailor-made contracts that reduce business risks, avoiding the use of templates taken from uncertain sources or outdated practices. In particular, we provide specialized advice for: the optimal identification of the applicable law and competent forum in international contracts; the informed choice among various types of international contracts, such as international sales, distribution, or agency agreements, and the drafting of clauses protecting the company from unexpected indemnities (such as agent termination indemnities within the EU); verifying the compatibility of standard clauses (boilerplate) and guarantees with mandatory rules of the countries of execution; and managing disputes, guiding the client in choosing between institutional arbitration (safer and faster) and ordinary jurisdiction, with a prior assessment of the recognizability and enforceability of the decision in the counterpart’s country.
Choosing Boschetti Law Firm means ensuring your business a robust and well-informed contractual protection. We invite you to contact us to build your next international success together.
Request a preliminary assessment
Fill in the form so that we can assess your case. We will contact you within 48 working hours to let you know if and how we can assist you.
Via dei Gracchi, 151
00192 Roma – Italy
info@italyvisainvestments.com
Tel: + 39 – 06 889 21971
By appointment only
Day: Monday – Friday
Hours: 9:00 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. / 4:00 p.m. – 8:00 p.m.
The source of funds must be demonstrated through banking and financial documentation proving ownership, availability, transferability, and lawful origin of the capital: recent bank statements (typically covering the last 3 months), certifications from the financial institution, and documents evidencing the source of funds (income, sale of assets, donations, or other traceable transactions).
For the Italian investor visa (minimum €500,000 in a company or €250,000 in an innovative startup), documentation must be in Italian or English (or officially translated) and verifiable. Authorities carry out anti-money laundering checks and also require proof of no criminal convictions and of the lawful origin of the funds.
No, purchasing a property in Italy does not automatically grant a residence permit. A non-EU national may freely buy property, subject to the condition of reciprocity, but residing in Italy requires an independent residence title: elective residence, investor visa, work, or another legal ground предусмотрed by law.
However, owning property can be a useful requirement for several types of residence permits, particularly elective residence. It demonstrates a connection to the territory and satisfies the accommodation requirement, as well as indicating the availability of sufficient financial resources. Therefore, the purchase should be part of an overall immigration strategy.
A foreign buyer pays the same taxes as an Italian citizen: a registration tax of 9%, or reduced to 2% if the “first home” benefit applies; VAT at 4% or 10% if purchasing from a developer. In addition, there are mortgage and cadastral taxes (€200 each for a first home).
The “first home” benefit is also available to foreigners, provided they establish residence in the municipality where the property is located within 18 months of purchase. Special tax regimes for new residents or inbound workers may offer further advantages on the taxation of foreign
There is no minimum amount set by law. The consulate assesses on a case-by-case basis whether the applicant has sufficient means to support themselves without working in Italy. In practice, an annual income from passive sources (pension, annuities, dividends) of at least €31,000 for a single applicant is generally considered sufficient, with higher thresholds for dependent family members.
Elective residence is intended for individuals who wish to relocate to Italy without carrying out any work activity. Owning a property or having a long-term rental agreement strengthens the application. Proof of passive income sources is the key requirement.
A representative office does not carry out commercial activities in Italy: it promotes the business, gathers information, and manages relationships with clients and suppliers without entering into contracts. As it does not constitute a permanent establishment, it does not generate taxable income in Italy and is not subject to corporate income tax (IRES) or VAT on its activities.
The advantages: a physical presence in the Italian market without direct taxation, low start-up costs, and no obligation to prepare separate financial statements. The obligations: registration with the REA (Economic and Administrative Index) at the Chamber of Commerce, keeping accounting records for expenses incurred, and filing withholding tax returns if employees are hired.
Foreign founders of innovative startups may benefit from a 30% personal income tax (IRPEF) deduction (up to 50% in certain cases) on investments in the company’s capital, the favorable tax regime for new residents, and exemption from Chamber of Commerce fees and stamp duties for the first five years.
The startup must be registered in the special section of the Companies Register and meet the requirements set out in Law Decree 179/2012, which are also verified by the Investor Visa for Italy Committee. As for immigration pathways, the investor visa requires a minimum investment of €250,000 in an innovative startup.